The Great Trade Rewiring: De-Globalization or Re-Globalization?
"De-globalization" has become the buzzword du jour. With trade wars, tariff escalations, and sanctions dominating headlines, one might conclude the era of global trade is ending. But what does the data actually show?
The UN Comtrade database offers a fascinating window into how global trade flows have shifted between 2019 and 2024. The patterns that emerge tell a more nuanced story than the headlines suggest.
The Big Picture: Trade Is Not Collapsing
Total exports by major economies reveal a surprising resilience:
Total Exports 2019-2024 (Billions USD)
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β + +β
β + + β
β β 3,000
β β
β + β
β+ β
β β
β x x xβ 2,000
β x β
βx β
β x β
β β
β o β 1,000
βo o o o oβ
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
++ China xx USA oo Japan
China's exports grew from $2.5T to $3.6T (up 43%). The US recovered from its pandemic dip to reach $2.1T. Japan remained remarkably stable around $700B.
Global trade has not collapsed. It appears to be restructuring.
The US-China Relationship: Still Entangled
Despite tariffs, decoupling rhetoric, and "friendshoring" policies, US-China trade volumes remain substantial:
| Flow | 2019 | 2022 (Peak) | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| China β USA | $419B | $583B | $526B |
| USA β China | $107B | $154B | $144B |
| Trade Deficit | $312B | $429B | $382B |
US-China Trade 2019-2024 (Billions USD)
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β x β
β + β 560
β β
β x β
β +β 520
β + β
β β
βx β 480
β x xβ
β + x β
β β 440
β+ β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
++ CHNβUSA xx USAβCHN
The trade war appears to have dented but not broken this relationship. US imports from China peaked in 2022 at $576B before settling at $463B in 2024βstill higher than 2019's $473B.
The Russia Pivot: China Fills the Gap
Here is where de-globalization does appear, but in a different form. Western sanctions on Russia after 2022 created a trade vacuum that China quickly filled:
China Exports to Russia 2019-2024 (Billions USD)
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β +β
β + β
β β 100
β β
β β
β β
β β
β + β
β + β
β β
β β
β+ + β 50
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
| Year | China β Russia | Change from 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $49.7B | baseline |
| 2021 | $67.2B | +35% |
| 2022 | $76.1B | +53% |
| 2023 | $110.9B | +123% |
| 2024 | $115.3B | +132% |
China's exports to Russia have more than doubled since sanctions began. Russia now ranks among China's top 10 export destinations, up from around 15th place pre-2022.
Meanwhile, Germany's exports to Russia collapsed from approximately $30B annually to near zero after 2022βa complete severance of what was once a major trading relationship.
What the Data Suggests
Rather than de-globalization, these patterns point toward something that might be called re-globalizationβa rewiring of trade networks along geopolitical lines:
US-China trade persists despite political tensions, likely because supply chain dependencies prove difficult to unwind quickly
Russia has pivoted East, with China absorbing much of the trade previously handled by European partners
Regional blocs appear to be strengtheningβUS trade with Mexico and Canada remains robust; EU internal trade continues to grow
New corridors are emergingβIndia-Russia trade, China-Middle East routes, and alternative payment systems developing outside Western frameworks
Observations
Trade volumes are not shrinking so much as redirecting. The 2020s may not be witnessing de-globalization but rather a great sorting, where trading relationships increasingly align with political alliances.
Several implications seem worth noting:
- Supply chains now carry explicit geopolitical risk
- "Friendshoring" is real but slowβexisting relationships have enormous inertia
- Alternative trade networks (BRICS+, Belt and Road) are gaining substance
- The old assumption that trade transcends politics is being tested
The era of "flat world" globalization may indeed be ending. What replaces it looks less like autarky and more like competing economic blocsβeach with its own gravity pulling trade flows into new configurations.
Data sources: UN Comtrade Database (United Nations) | All values in current USD.